I have decided to focus on PETA contacting
higher organisations that in turn hold more power.
At the moment, PETA does
well in getting their message across to a wide range and a large audience.
However this targeted audience has minimal actual impact. PETA focus on
petitions and protests that is effective in raising awareness and railing
people and getting a reaction, what they fail to do is reach the attention of
higher and more dominant companies that actually may be able to may a change.
So what I want PETA to start doing – is raise awareness and even make
partnerships with organisations that deal with animal cruelty (such as companies that are known for testing on
animals etc). This may seem like a bold and slightly ‘strange’ or even ‘risky’
move by associating themselves with companies that have a reputation that is
exactly the opposite of what PETA represents.
PETA have recently decided to
become a shareholder with Prada, who are openly known for using animal skins
for their products and their reason for this: ‘PETA has become a Prada
shareholder in order to attend the company’s annual meetings and officially
call for an end to all exotic-skins sales’. Their method is to target major
organisations from the inside. By having a seat within meetings held, they can
voice their opinions to Prada and actually be heard. You cant avoid someone
when they are sitting right in front of you...
Persuasion Techniques:
My first persuasion technique can be found
in Andrews, Van Leeuwen & Van Baaren’s Hidden Persuasion book, which
discusses 33 different psychological influence techniques used in advertising.
This technique is known as ‘Foot-In-The-Door’. This is when someone or an
organization begins with a small request that then paves the way for compliance
to a bigger request.
This is a great techniques for PETA to
adopt, as it is partially what they have already done with Prada, they have
started with a small step and in this case have literally got their foot in the
door of the company, but Prada are probably unaware of what to expect, they are
not to know that through this they have allowed them to be present in major
decisions meaning that Prada have ultimately given PETA a lot more power than
they realise.
It is simple how this can be implemented,
as they have already proven it is possible. It is not yet been confirmed how
effective this strategy is as PETA have not had a chance to meet with Prada
yet, but there first board meeting is waiting promptly. So the results will be
visible soon and we can see for ourselves if this is a successful strategy.
Other slight differentiations/alternatives
of this technique are the ‘Rationalisation Trap’, ‘Bait-and-Switch’,
‘Ben-Franklin Effect’ and the ‘Low-Ball Technique’.
My second persuasion technique is ‘social
proof’. This is where people have an innate drive to copy others’ decisions and
behaviour. This can also be found in the same book as previously mentioned.
In our modern day, Western culture is
extraordinarily individualistic. We believe that our actions are out own and
that our decisions are driven by private needs. However humans are social
animals: Across the ages we have depended on groups to survive and other
people’s behavior is highly informative for successfully choosing our own
course of action. Given this firmly held belief that we are our own masters, it
may seem paradoxical that social proof is particularly powerful as an influence
technique. However it is due to this belief that we are less prepared to defend
ourselves against social pressures.
It is common knowledge that PETA has a high
online following and their close attention to there many social platforms is
exactly how they become so popular and built their reputation. Social media is
a key communication technique and PETA have definitely used it to their
advantage in the past and are still using it in an effective way. When people
see their friends or celebrities or people they may consider role models liking
or supporting PETA then they will feel more inclined to do so too. It is in our
nature to copy other peoples desired behaviour.
This can be implemented in many ways. It
can be used on all of the social media platforms that PETA uses; Facebook,
Twitter, blogs and Instagram etc. They are already good with their social media
and their following, it just needs to be reinforced and continued.
Other concepts that are related to social
proof are ‘Asch Line Length Experiments’, ‘Autokinetic Effect’, ‘Bandwagon
Effect’, ‘Bystander Effect’, ‘Copycat Suicides’ and ‘Information Cascade”.
Other techniques that could have potential
to work for PETA are:
- · Acknowledge Resistance
- · Attractiveness
- · Scarcity
- · Fleeting Attraction
- · Mere Exposure
- · Astroturfing
- · Anthropomorphism
- · Implementation Intentions
- · Authority
- · Loss vs Gain Framing
- · Fear Appeals
- · Projection
- · Door-in-the-Face
- · Subliminal Messaging
I liked reading this blog! It is very clear why you chose to write about PETA and where they can improve on their persuasion techniques. The two techniques you chose are the rights ones I guess. The foot-in-the-door technique works really well because as you stated above they already physically have their foor in the door of Prada. Of course Social Proof works really well here. I think it is very good that you showed that there are even more persuasion techniques that could work well for PETA. I can't really think of anything you have to improve on! Good Job!!!
ReplyDeleteHey Nicky,
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading your blog as it explains about the things that PETA is currently doing right and what could be improved. Besides that, the techniques chosen are very interesting for your community. I enjoyed reading that list of 'other possible techniques' that could be used for PETA. I also enjoyed seeing the pictures throughout the blog as it gave a charm to your overal layout.